The SCOTUS on the 2A means that "may issue" is anti-war and all fifty states are "shall issue" states.
What SCOTUS DID NOT do, was tell states CAN NOT do to sidestep the "shall issue" - "issue"!
New York immediately averted the "shall issue" ruling was to restrict where concealed weapons may be carried.
They basically declared the entire state of New York as a "sensitive area" and off limits to concealed carry. You can now get a concealed carry license, but there is nowhere to carry concealed! 😳
In the below article, the writer claims the GCA '34 needs to be repealed as today's technology has pretty much surpassed the act's restrictions.
The GCA '34 claims that a sawed off shotgun does not fit within the 2A definition of a type of weapon a militia would employ, thus, should be restricted.
Now anti-2A'ers claim that the AR15/AK47 are military (militia?) type weapons and should be restricted.
You can't have it both ways.
https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...ws_to_bed.html
What SCOTUS DID NOT do, was tell states CAN NOT do to sidestep the "shall issue" - "issue"!
New York immediately averted the "shall issue" ruling was to restrict where concealed weapons may be carried.
They basically declared the entire state of New York as a "sensitive area" and off limits to concealed carry. You can now get a concealed carry license, but there is nowhere to carry concealed! 😳
In the below article, the writer claims the GCA '34 needs to be repealed as today's technology has pretty much surpassed the act's restrictions.
The GCA '34 claims that a sawed off shotgun does not fit within the 2A definition of a type of weapon a militia would employ, thus, should be restricted.
Now anti-2A'ers claim that the AR15/AK47 are military (militia?) type weapons and should be restricted.
You can't have it both ways.
https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...ws_to_bed.html
Comment