Top Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stephen Breyer Stepping Down...........

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Perhaps the Republicans can find an issue where the democrat nominee is defending killing babies or taking firearms from vulnerable populations. How hard is that!!!!

    Let's GO Brandon!!!

    Comment


    • #17
      It only takes 50 votes to confirm, and they've got them.

      Comment


      • #18
        The confirmation of Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, 1991.

        "... just be honest ..."

        "Honesty" is not in the liberal vocabulary.

        https://youtu.be/rca-_DOgBPU

        Comment


        • #19
          "As the White House considers candidates to replace the retiring justice, they’ll need a judge who is guaranteed to garner support from every member of the Democratic caucus. That raises the stakes for the confirmation battle, but also provides some comfort for Democrats: as long as they stay unified, Republicans can’t stop Breyer’s successor from being confirmed. Republicans scrapped the 60-vote threshold on high court nominees in 2017."

          https://www.politico.com/news/2022/0...gress-00002420

          Comment


          • #20
            The only thing that would cause the Democrats to fail to support a nominee is if he or she swore to be loyal to the Constitution. Democrats consider the Constitution to be a liability to governing. If the nominee swore to Defend the Constitution against enemies foreign and domestic they would have to vote the nominee down. Loserville rules!

            Let's GO Brandon!!!

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by labrador12 View Post
              The only thing that would cause the Democrats to fail to support a nominee is if he or she swore to be loyal to the Constitution. Democrats consider the Constitution to be a liability to governing. If the nominee swore to Defend the Constitution against enemies foreign and domestic they would have to vote the nominee down. Loserville rules!

              Let's GO Brandon!!!
              What did Obama say?
              "The Constitution is an old, outdated document and needs to be updated."

              "... Obama in his interview (2001) disparages the Constitution as merely "a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can't do to you. Says what the federal government can't do to you but doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf." He believes—and he's right—that changing this is the way to bring about "redistributive change." ..."
              Last edited by FirstBubba; 01-27-2022, 07:46 PM.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by labrador12 View Post
                The only thing that would cause the Democrats to fail to support a nominee is if he or she swore to be loyal to the Constitution. Democrats consider the Constitution to be a liability to governing. If the nominee swore to Defend the Constitution against enemies foreign and domestic they would have to vote the nominee down. Loserville rules!

                Let's GO Brandon!!!
                That is an insult to the intelligence of our readers.

                Comment


                • #23
                  '99, I know two votes they might not get.

                  BTY, if these Judges are suppose to follow the law and constitution, why does it matter what color they are. Answer: they, especially the blacks have agenda's and they vote as blocks.

                  They are called 'Social Constructionists',, a small, minority that believes what has been for Centuries DOES NOT have to be in the future. The whims of Society can morph into a form of a new NORM, and Courts can abd do facilitate it. . CRT, Equity, LGBTQUEER and all that is a trending new normal - ONLY if the 85% remainder of Society allows it
                  Grasshopper, Pay Attention to your Local Society, City and School and Government, it is up to you.
                  Last edited by jhjimbo; 01-27-2022, 10:42 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Then Justice Clarence Thomas must be an exception to the rule.
                    BTW, I do not expect Joe Biden to nominate a conservative.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      (d)'s are chomping at the bit.
                      Biden has vowed to "nominate" a black, female justice, regardless of qualifications, to SCOTUS.
                      They "know" the GOP will vote against ANY liberal. If that nominee just happens to be black AND female....they will throw out that (R)'s are "racist" and "misogynistic"!

                      ....but wait!

                      https://redstate.com/sister-toldjah/...things-n513591

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Biden's SCOTUS pick won't be a "shoo-in".

                        https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2022...-stamp-n513443

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Even RINO Sen S. Collins (R-ME) is telling (d)'s to "slow their roll" on Biden's SCOTUS pick.
                          Even Manchin and Sinema are both claiming they won't "rubber stamp" just anyone COVID Joe nominates.


                          https://wethepeopledaily.com/2022/01...e-scotus-pick/

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Rule 26

                            https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/28...cotus-nominee/

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by FirstBubba View Post
                              The "grapevine" is saying Biden may nominate K. Harris to replace Breyer.
                              If the Judicial Committee confirmation vote is a "tie", K. Harris can, theoretically, vote for herself to replace Breyer.

                              How 'bout them apples!? 🤯
                              It appears I may have been "mistooken"! LOL!
                              This writer seems to think VP Harris would be unable to cast a "tie-breaker" vote.

                              https://citizenfreepress.com/breakin...cotus-nominee/

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Bubba -
                                I don't believe Joe Biden vowed to nominate "a black female justice, regardless of qualifications."
                                I'm calling B.S. on that.

                                Comment

                                Welcome!

                                Collapse

                                Welcome to Field and Streams's Answers section. Here you will find hunting, fishing, and survival tips from the editors of Field and Stream, as well as recommendations from readers like yourself.

                                If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ for information on posting and navigating the forums.

                                And don't forget to check out the latest reviews on guns and outdoor gear on fieldandstream.com.

                                Right Rail 1

                                Collapse

                                Top Active Users

                                Collapse

                                There are no top active users.

                                Right Rail 2

                                Collapse

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                • Reply to Future of Energy
                                  by 99explorer
                                  I really think you guys ought to move to Australia.
                                  Yesterday, 10:36 PM
                                • Future of Energy
                                  by jhjimbo
                                  It is a mixed bag going forward. Some refiners have closed and no new ones will be built (approved). Everything will be based on supply and demand....
                                  Yesterday, 08:14 AM
                                • Reply to Future of Energy
                                  by bowhunter75richard
                                  The cost of energy is now becoming a very serious issue. Much of the present problem is a result of refineries closing down due to declining income. And...
                                  Yesterday, 09:19 PM
                                • Reply to Buffalo Shooting
                                  by 99explorer
                                  When your gripes are many
                                  and your rewards are few,
                                  remember that the mighty oak
                                  was once a nut like you.
                                  Yesterday, 09:01 PM
                                • Buffalo Shooting
                                  by jhjimbo
                                  18 yo goes into a grocery store dressed in body armor and tactical gear. Records everything as he shoots 13 people.
                                  Gov. Kathy Hochul jumped all...
                                  05-15-2022, 12:24 AM

                                Right Rail 3

                                Collapse

                                Footer Ad

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X