Top Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

COVID 19 “Super-spreader” !....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • rock rat
    replied
    He's pulling your leg.

    Leave a comment:


  • 99explorer
    replied
    Check for other symptoms.
    Do you still have your sense of taste and smell?

    Leave a comment:


  • jhjimbo
    replied
    How much Covid is in Portugal ?

    My normal temp is 97 deg, today it is 99. Does that mean I have Covid ?

    Leave a comment:


  • 99explorer
    replied
    In Portugal, There Is Virtually No One Left to Vaccinate.

    https://news.yahoo.com/portugal-virt...141101052.html

    Manuela Ivone da Cunha, a Portuguese anthropologist who has studied anti-vaccination movements, said that “vaccine doubters and anti-vaxxers are in the minority in Portugal, and they are also less vocal” than they are in many other countries.
    Last edited by 99explorer; 10-02-2021, 10:24 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • 99explorer
    replied
    Merck says a trial shows it has produced the first effective antiviral pill for Covid.

    This pill could be a life-saver for the unvaccinated who have become infected with the covid-19.


    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/01/u...ill-covid.html

    Last edited by 99explorer; 10-01-2021, 12:36 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • jhjimbo
    replied
    Originally posted by rock rat View Post
    So far it seems the booster makes it pretty hard to get covid. J+J just came out with their own findings that a second dose after 6 months is about as good as it's possible to get.

    Took my wife to get her third this eve, place was packed with docs and nurses.
    Just in time because the next strain is coming out of Japan along with it's variants. They don't know how effective our existing vaccines will be against the new ones.

    Research is continuing in Wuhan as 'gain of function' supported by Fauci and Bill Gates. Only reason to research 'gain of function' is to weaponize a virus.

    Leave a comment:


  • FirstBubba
    replied
    Project Veritas releases video of health care workers.

    https://wethepeopledaily.com/2021/09...t-you-to-know/

    Leave a comment:


  • rock rat
    replied
    Bowhunter you're pretty much correct. People who think otherwise never had much grasp on math or read sensationalists (and very false) sources. 1/250,000,000 is a lot less than 1/50

    Leave a comment:


  • FirstBubba
    replied
    Bhr, the survival rate of the disease (COVID-19) is over well over 95%.
    The dangers of the vaccine, to me, don't outweigh the survivability of the disease.

    Leave a comment:


  • 99explorer
    replied
    Those who did not survive the the virus have a form of immunity, and should be counted toward our goal of achieving herd immunity.

    Leave a comment:


  • bowhunter75richard
    replied
    I am not sure I fully understand the argument concerning natural immunity and vaccination. Natural immunity is being claimed to be of greater protection and of less possible danger than the consequences of side affects of a person receiving the vaccine. But, the immunity can only be obtained thru surviving the virus in the first place. If this is the case, is it not rather a guessing game to risk the virus just to see if one survives so that they are then immune ? There are over half a million in America alone who have not survived Covid and thus did not gain immunity. How does one decide to risk surviving the initial virus is better than attempting thru vaccination of possibly not being infected in the first place ? Am I missing something here in this analogy ? Why risk being infected just to see if it will provide immunity ? Sounds a little like Russian roulette, does it not ?

    Leave a comment:


  • FirstBubba
    replied
    Originally posted by PigHunter
    Natural SARS-CoV-2 infection induces more durable immunity than vaccination study suggests (news-medical.net)

    "Importantly, a significantly higher neutralization efficacy against all tested variants (alpha, beta, gamma, and delta) was observed in unvaccinated COVID-19 recovered individuals than in vaccinated SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals. A comparable neutralization potency against the delta variant was observed in COVID-19 recovered individuals and first dose-vaccinated naïve individuals. However, a significant reduction in neutralization potency was observed after the second vaccine dose. This finding indicates that mRNA vaccine-induced cross-reactivity is lower than that induced by natural infection."

    Soooo, does this mean the second dose of 'vaccine' actually made things worse????
    Yes sir, it does.
    Hospitals and the Gov't has basically banned the use of Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin to treat COVID.
    Patients that present with shortness of breath and elevated heart rate (same symptoms as pericarditis and myocarditis caused by the vaccine) are given Remdasivere (sp?) and placed on a ventilator. Most die.
    The Gov't is paying "Big Pharma" megabucks for a vaccine that didn't even exist 12 months ago and wasn't ok'd by the FDA until less than 90 days ago.
    As long as the vaccine is still on the "emergency use" list, Big Pharma gets paid.
    If Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin (NOT the paste horse dewormer!) cure COVID, there is no need for the "vaccine".
    Therefore, the ban on Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin.

    Leave a comment:


  • rock rat
    replied
    So far it seems the booster makes it pretty hard to get covid. J+J just came out with their own findings that a second dose after 6 months is about as good as it's possible to get.

    Took my wife to get her third this eve, place was packed with docs and nurses.

    Leave a comment:


  • FirstBubba
    replied
    Originally posted by PigHunter
    Why does Biden keep talking as if COVID-19 vaccines don't work? (msn.com)

    When President Biden announced his intention to require workers to be vaccinated, he made a peculiar statement. It could have been another Biden malapropism, but if it wasn't, Biden's comment is telling.

    "We're going to protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated co-workers," Biden said. "We're going to reduce the spread of COVID-19 by increasing the share of the workforce that is vaccinated in businesses all across America."

    Biden's statement is illogical. The entire point of the vaccine is to protect people from getting COVID-19. Except the vaccine is supposed to shield people from the virus. Yet based on what Biden said, it could be inferred that the vaccine does not work.

    His stated intention to "protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated workers" defies what the experts have been advising from the beginning. If everyone must be vaccinated to protect those who already received their vaccination, how effective are the vaccines?
    Speaking logically:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Covid-Mandate-Vaccination-Unvaccinated.jpg
Views:	100
Size:	102.8 KB
ID:	780810

    Same b.s. with the masks. Masks protect noone unless you're working in a dusty environment

    Leave a comment:


  • 99explorer
    replied
    The vaccines are not 100% effective.
    Also, the unvaccinated are giving the virus more opportunities to mutate.

    Leave a comment:

Welcome!

Collapse

Welcome to Field and Streams's Answers section. Here you will find hunting, fishing, and survival tips from the editors of Field and Stream, as well as recommendations from readers like yourself.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ for information on posting and navigating the forums.

And don't forget to check out the latest reviews on guns and outdoor gear on fieldandstream.com.

Right Rail 1

Collapse

Top Active Users

Collapse

There are no top active users.

Right Rail 2

Collapse

Latest Topics

Collapse

Right Rail 3

Collapse

Footer Ad

Collapse
Working...
X