Top Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Yea !!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Danbo
    https://certpool.com/conferences/2021-02-19


    This is a link of all the cases SCOTUS has for yesterday's conference. How many cases a year does court take 20 maybe.

    What are the odds their going to take Powell's case?
    100 to 1 How do I know ? If you don't try you don't get anywhere.

    Comment


    • #32
      I don't understand the grounds the Supreme Court did not take the case. An imbecile could look at the evidence and see the Election is fraudulent.
      Last edited by jhjimbo; 02-22-2021, 12:58 PM.

      Comment


      • #33
        The Supreme Court let down over 75 million voters, I don't think they will be very happy.
        Last edited by jhjimbo; 02-22-2021, 05:03 PM.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Danbo

          Because the establishment on both sides hated Trump. So they fortified (stole) the election and installed Biden. Nothing is going to change.

          like I said in another post we are Mexico if we're lucky or Zimbabwe if we aren't.
          Ol jimbo is just dense danbo.

          It's really pretty simple.
          The Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of Gov't are "co-equal".

          If SCOTUS were to hear the case and they "rule" against Biden and prove fraud, Biden would be obligated to "step down" as POTUS.
          That means the Judicial branch would be "ruling against" a "co-equal" branch, i.e. the Executive.
          The Constitution won't allow it.


          Edit:

          Seems Justice C. Thomas thinks SCOTUS "should" take up this case. But it's just the PA case.

          https://redstate.com/bonchie/2021/02...awsuit-n331240
          Last edited by FirstBubba; 02-22-2021, 09:39 PM.

          Comment


          • #35
            That is called "checks and balances."
            The Judicial branch rules against the Legislative branch all the time.


            And the Senate provides advice and consent to the president on treaties and nominations to the Judicial branch..
            Last edited by 99explorer; 02-22-2021, 07:22 PM.

            Comment


            • #36
              Sidney Powell and Mike Lindell both sued by Dominium. At the Court they will present all their evidence of the vote fraud. This is a coming attraction.

              Comment


              • #37
                Sidney Powell is full of kraken.

                Comment


                • #38
                  SCOTUS rejected Powell's latest attempts. BOTH of them.
                  Just today. Mar 1, 2021

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Feb 22 2021 Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion) Justice Alito, with whom Justice Gorsuch joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      In reading the Opinion Of Justice Thomas, there are repeated statements by him to the loss of security with mail in ballots, also to the possibility of fraud in voting as a result of mail in voting, even giving examples of such in several instances. He also stated the invalidity of rule changes in voting in the state of PA. But with all that he stated, the court still refused to take up the case of the 2020 presidential election !!! What good is the court if it fails to hear a case that it itself states there were problems involved ? Everyone should read the information presented by crm and understand the words of Justice Thomas.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Justices Alito and Thomas seem pretty decisive that SCOTUS should pick up the cases.
                        Sadly, Trump's three appointees, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Coney-Barrett are the ones who seem to be running cold or hot.
                        The other 4, we KNOW which end of their candle is lit!
                        Roberts has become a wild card.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          The court needs more than "the possibility of fraud."
                          The existence of fraud is necessary.
                          It is not enough to say that the voting machines "could be" rigged.
                          You have to prove that the machines "were rigged."
                          The courts have pointed out that the supporting affidavits were "conclusory."

                          Comment

                          Welcome!

                          Collapse

                          Welcome to Field and Streams's Answers section. Here you will find hunting, fishing, and survival tips from the editors of Field and Stream, as well as recommendations from readers like yourself.

                          If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ for information on posting and navigating the forums.

                          And don't forget to check out the latest reviews on guns and outdoor gear on fieldandstream.com.

                          Right Rail 1

                          Collapse

                          Top Active Users

                          Collapse

                          There are no top active users.

                          Right Rail 2

                          Collapse

                          Latest Topics

                          Collapse

                          Right Rail 3

                          Collapse

                          Footer Ad

                          Collapse
                          Working...
                          X