I am not forgetting about the property.
I am contradicting your false statement of the law that could get someone into trouble.
You quoted from a statute that purports to allow the use of deadly force "to protect any private property that you own."
Then you omitted a paragraph that cited case law saying that the law "does not go so far as permitting the use of deadly force to merely protect personal property."
That is a very dishonest omission.
I am contradicting your false statement of the law that could get someone into trouble.
You quoted from a statute that purports to allow the use of deadly force "to protect any private property that you own."
Then you omitted a paragraph that cited case law saying that the law "does not go so far as permitting the use of deadly force to merely protect personal property."
That is a very dishonest omission.
Comment