Top Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Will the "fat lady" sing on Wednesday...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FirstBubba
    replied
    "... Second verse same as the first!
    Could be better but it's gonna be worse! ..."

    Leave a comment:


  • 99explorer
    replied
    Now here is an idea whose time has come, a "censure" of the president, instead of removal from office.
    It would cover the tails of Republican senators who vote "not guilty" in spite of the evidence.


    https://news.yahoo.com/still-undecid...230028003.html

    Leave a comment:


  • 99explorer
    replied
    Come to think of it, there is something Trump could do to win reelection, but it takes a bigger man than he is to do it.

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/tr...of2&yptr=yahoo

    Leave a comment:


  • bowhunter75richard
    replied
    Originally posted by jhjimbo View Post
    Who knows if Bolton will tell the truth in his book. Maybe it is all fiction.
    He may have a bit of a grudge to grind since he was relieved of his post by Trump. And words in a book can be considerably different than those said under oath ! It all depends on how much he now ‘hates’ Trump !! The book is one thing, but the release of it’s contents when supposed to be under the security protection of the NSC is a much more important issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • jhjimbo
    replied
    Who knows if Bolton will tell the truth in his book. Maybe it is all fiction.

    Leave a comment:


  • 99explorer
    replied
    Not that long ago, Trump was in favor of executing drug dealers.
    Well, he just ran a $5 million commercial during the Super Bowl featuring a woman of color who had been serving a life sentence for high volume drug trafficking and money laundering.
    In the commercial video, she thanked Trump for granting her a pardon.
    I wonder now if there is anything he would not do to win re-election.

    Leave a comment:


  • Danbo
    replied
    Originally posted by bowhunter75richard View Post
    It appears as though pelosi may have had a definite purpose in mind by withholding the articles of impeachment from the Senate ! Doesn’t it seem a little coincidental that during that time Bolton’s book made an appearance, and a added coincidence being that it just happened to be leaked to the NYT’s. There was more than one leak during this horse and pony show put on by the dimwits, and just who was doing it ? I hope the R’s have the testicles to call for investigations into some of the BS from the D’s !! Being satisfied with a not guilty is not enough.
    Not only that but it kept Bernie out of Iowa while Biden campaigned all he wanted to the dem establishment hated Bernie as much as never Trumpers hate Trump

    Leave a comment:


  • Danbo
    replied
    Originally posted by 99explorer View Post
    You can count on acquittal.
    The "fix" is in.
    So there was no FIX in House?

    Leave a comment:


  • bowhunter75richard
    replied
    It appears as though pelosi may have had a definite purpose in mind by withholding the articles of impeachment from the Senate ! Doesn’t it seem a little coincidental that during that time Bolton’s book made an appearance, and a added coincidence being that it just happened to be leaked to the NYT’s. There was more than one leak during this horse and pony show put on by the dimwits, and just who was doing it ? I hope the R’s have the testicles to call for investigations into some of the BS from the D’s !! Being satisfied with a not guilty is not enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • Danbo
    replied
    Originally posted by 99explorer View Post
    The whole purpose of the impeachment trial was to air out Trump's dirty laundry before the public, and that it accomplished, in abbreviated form because the witnesses were blocked.
    The Bolton book will prolong the public interest, perhaps longer than the trial with witnesses, because the vast majority of the American people will believe Bolton over Trump.
    Americans will not believe warmongering Chicken hawk Bolton over anybody

    Leave a comment:


  • Danbo
    replied
    Originally posted by fitch270 View Post
    The media and the left seem to believe if they keep up with the narrative that eventually the public will buy into it, problem is they can't keep crying wolf or they'll be completely ignored. Besides that they just end up looking ridiculous losing time after time. If they keep handing Trump wins all it's going to do is make people still on the fence about him climb on the bandwagon instead.

    If they really were smart they'd start playing nice with Trump, build up some trust with the public then turn the tables on him. I doubt they have it in them.
    The media is already being ignored

    Leave a comment:


  • Danbo
    replied
    Originally posted by FirstBubba View Post
    ...or will the choir just be inhaling for the next verse?

    https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb...-escaped-issue

    After finding no evidence of any crime and bringing Trump up on useless, "trumped up" (pun intended!) charges, will the (D)'s stop the insanity or continue down their "Road to Ruination"?
    What other charges?
    The killing of Qasem Soleimani?
    They want corona virus to be Trumps Katrina

    Leave a comment:


  • 99explorer
    replied
    The whole purpose of the impeachment trial was to air out Trump's dirty laundry before the public, and that it accomplished, in abbreviated form because the witnesses were blocked.
    The Bolton book will prolong the public interest, perhaps longer than the trial with witnesses, because the vast majority of the American people will believe Bolton over Trump.

    Leave a comment:


  • fitch270
    replied
    The media and the left seem to believe if they keep up with the narrative that eventually the public will buy into it, problem is they can't keep crying wolf or they'll be completely ignored. Besides that they just end up looking ridiculous losing time after time. If they keep handing Trump wins all it's going to do is make people still on the fence about him climb on the bandwagon instead.

    If they really were smart they'd start playing nice with Trump, build up some trust with the public then turn the tables on him. I doubt they have it in them.

    Leave a comment:


  • FirstBubba
    replied
    I figure M. Waters (D CA), A. Green (D TX), S. Jackson-Lee (D TX) and Schiff/Nadler will come up with some manufactured nonsense.

    Leave a comment:

Welcome!

Collapse

Welcome to Field and Streams's Answers section. Here you will find hunting, fishing, and survival tips from the editors of Field and Stream, as well as recommendations from readers like yourself.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ for information on posting and navigating the forums.

And don't forget to check out the latest reviews on guns and outdoor gear on fieldandstream.com.

Right Rail 1

Collapse

Top Active Users

Collapse

There are no top active users.

Right Rail 2

Collapse

Latest Topics

Collapse

Right Rail 3

Collapse

Footer Ad

Collapse
Working...
X