Thus far, the game plan for Trump's defense consists of attacks on the prosecution, and the bulk of his support is from the lunatic fringe that thrives on conspiracy theories.
Top Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
No Witnesses
Collapse
X
-
Yeah, the defence has been built around whether this is an impeachable offence. "High crimes and misdemeanours" is indeed vague. But the president using his power and government money to discredit a potential political opponent is certainly extremely bad form (and definitely a criminal offence in just about every state). I'm not adverse to stretching (if it is a stretch) the meaning of high crimes and misdemeanours to establish this kind of precedent. Could only be an excellent deterrent for future presidents no matter what party they belong to. Similarly I think acquitting Trump based solely on the supposed ambiguity of high crimes and misdemeanours will set a terrible precedent. Sure doesn't look good for democracy if the president of the US can beat the rap on a technicality.
I'm anxious to hear what Bolton has to say (or rather, to hear him say it ... we already know what he will say). I am sure the Republicans want to shut this guy up. Mostly I think because Bolton is a loudmouth (a prerequisite for Fox News commentator) and a bully. He didn't do the party any favours when he appeared before the Senate the last time over Bush's attempted appointment of him as UN representative. What a fiasco that was. I must say this is just the kinda guy I would expect Trump would have put in his outfit. Those two are cut from the same cloth, that's for sure. Well, almost the same cloth. Like Trump, Bolton may be a flaming arsehole and a loudmouth, but unlike Trump, he's not stupid. I can't see him going along with withholding Congressional aid for that purpose. And I can certainly see Bolton telling Trump quite bluntly (because Bolton has a reputation for being "blunt" and "rude") that it was a mistake. The White House was obviously too leaky to be doing something that foolish. We all know how well Trump takes it when his staff tries to tell him he's making a mistake. Ask Rex Tillerson. Anyway, Bolton testimony is a way out of this mess for the Republicans. They should make use of the opportunity. On the other hand I really think it will be a huge mistake if they try to block it. American voters, both Democrat and Republican, want transparency. They want the show. That's why they voted in a TV reality show host. Any senator looking at reelection who tries to block transparency will pay the price next fall. His opponent will capitalise on that big time with a show of his own. Even those senators up for reelection four years down the road have to be nervous about blocking Bolton's testimony. Or they should be if they're smart. Anyway, trials are supposed to be about hearing testimony. That's basic common law principle.Last edited by Ontario Honker Hunter; 01-28-2020, 01:42 PM.
Comment
-
When I hear people feeling too sorry for others......makes me wonder what terrible sins theyve committed.
Trying to salve a wounded conscience, not by their time/ energy or money......no they want to legislate that from other people to make themselves feel better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ontario Honker Hunter View PostYeah, the defence has been built around whether this is an impeachable offence. "High crimes and misdemeanours" is indeed vague. But the president using his power and government money to discredit a potential political opponent is certainly extremely bad form (and definitely a criminal offence in just about every state). I'm not adverse to stretching (if it is a stretch) the meaning of high crimes and misdemeanours to establish this kind of precedent. Could only be an excellent deterrent for future presidents no matter what party they belong to. Similarly I think acquitting Trump based solely on the supposed ambiguity of high crimes and misdemeanours will set a terrible precedent. Sure doesn't look good for democracy if the president of the US can beat the rap on a technicality.
I'm anxious to hear what Bolton has to say (or rather, to hear him say it ... we already know what he will say). I am sure the Republicans want to shut this guy up. Mostly I think because Bolton is a loudmouth (a prerequisite for Fox News commentator) and a bully. He didn't do the party any favours when he appeared before the Senate the last time over Bush's attempted appointment of him as UN representative. What a fiasco that was. I must say this is just the kinda guy I would expect Trump would have put in his outfit. Those two are cut from the same cloth, that's for sure. Well, almost the same cloth. Like Trump, Bolton may be a flaming arsehole and a loudmouth, but unlike Trump, he's not stupid. I can't see him going along with withholding Congressional aid for that purpose. And I can certainly see Bolton telling Trump quite bluntly (because Bolton has a reputation for being "blunt" and "rude") that it was a mistake. The White House was obviously too leaky to be doing something that foolish. We all know how well Trump takes it when his staff tries to tell him he's making a mistake. Ask Rex Tillerson. Anyway, Bolton testimony is a way out of this mess for the Republicans. They should make use of the opportunity. On the other hand I really think it will be a huge mistake if they try to block it. American voters, both Democrat and Republican, want transparency. They want the show. That's why they voted in a TV reality show host. Any senator looking at reelection who tries to block transparency will pay the price next fall. His opponent will capitalise on that big time with a show of his own. Even those senators up for reelection four years down the road have to be nervous about blocking Bolton's testimony. Or they should be if they're smart. Anyway, trials are supposed to be about hearing testimony. That's basic common law principle.
Comment
-
Just because you think somebody is ignorant or obnoxious is not reason to impeach 99.look at my governor he’s prolly corrupt but I don’t think he will be removed and he shouldn’t be the people need to vote. The dims have been saying all along if we don’t impeach him he’s going to win again. This will be all over by end of week any ways.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Danbo View Post
"... When Obama was president he was my president I didn’t go around on blogs bashing him I hope all is well. To many hateful people in the world. ..."
BUT....!
I will still bash Trump if I think he's doing the wrong thing!Last edited by FirstBubba; 01-28-2020, 07:07 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FirstBubba View Post
I unabashedly bashed Obama at every opportunity, especially when he blatantly did stupid stuff.
BUT....!
I 3ill sleep badh Trump if I think he's doing the wrong thing!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Danbo View Post
FB yes but you don’t hate the man you hate his policies it’s ok to disagree but there are three on here who have hate in there hearts like Trump wronged them in past it’s ridiculous !
Strong, intense dislike, but never "hate".
"Hate" is a very ugly word.
Comment
-
Back on topic, Mitch McConnell has just indicated that he does not have the votes to block witnesses.
https://news.yahoo.com/are-boltons-a...212745700.html
Comment
Welcome!
Collapse
Welcome to Field and Streams's Answers section. Here you will find hunting, fishing, and survival tips from the editors of Field and Stream, as well as recommendations from readers like yourself.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ for information on posting and navigating the forums.
And don't forget to check out the latest reviews on guns and outdoor gear on fieldandstream.com.
Right Rail 1
Collapse
Top Active Users
Collapse
There are no top active users.
Right Rail 2
Collapse
Latest Topics
Collapse
-
Reply to Nraby Danbohttps://www.creditslips.org/creditsl...ankruptcy.html
I wish I didn't just send them money.
I now believe...-
Channel: Other
Today, 09:48 AM -
-
Reply to Bad news on the COVID-19 frontby rock ratThe downward trend in infections is even being mentioned in major news sources. Average daily numbers have dipped below 2,000,000 for the first time in...
-
Channel: Other
Today, 09:45 AM -
-
New cases and hospitalizations ballooned this week in several states including Texas, Oklahoma, California, and Mississippi. Hospitals in Houston are...
-
Channel: Other
06-24-2020, 09:09 PM -
Right Rail 3
Collapse
Footer Ad
Collapse
Comment