Top Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Whistleblower ID'd!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Whistleblower ID'd!

    A "whistleblower" gets protection from retaliation for providing inside information, not anonymity.

    https://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...oes-defcon-one

    https://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2019/11/06/rand-paul-introduces-people-telling-cant-whistleblower-constitution/amp/
    Last edited by FirstBubba; 11-07-2019, 08:55 AM.

  • #2
    The whistle blower is like the restaurant patron who called the Board of Health, and they came and found violations.
    He should not have to be identified if his complaints were found to be valid.
    His testimony is not needed for the issuance of citations by the inspectors.

    Comment


    • #3
      Problem is the whistleblower isnt somebody trying to do what is right. Hes not as the left would try to have folks believe. Anonymity would let them continue w the scam

      Comment


      • #4
        Click image for larger version

Name:	eric-ciaramella-600x444.jpg
Views:	151
Size:	48.8 KB
ID:	717676

        Comment


        • #5
          https://www.lacortenews.com/n/whistl...ric-ciaramella

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by CD2 View Post
            Click image for larger version

Name:	eric-ciaramella-600x444.jpg
Views:	151
Size:	48.8 KB
ID:	717676
            Awesome set of references and qualifications ... NOT!

            Comment


            • #7
              If he is indeed the whistleblower, does that mean that Trump is innocent of the crime?

              Comment


              • #8
                You are saying he committed a crime. Past tense.

                There needs to be proof. Not rumor. From reputable sources and proper investigation.

                Hows that Russian collusion thing workin for ya?

                FBI and other gov have already proven corrupt. They work for themselves, not for the people or for the rule of law.

                They protected Obama, Holder and the Clintons. Hell yes theyre theyre after Trump.

                Hes the turd in the liberal punchbowl. If not for him most would be drinking the Jonestown Koolaid.

                As for morality, sounds and looks like the whistleblower likes to blow more than whistles.


                Comment


                • #9
                  With regard to the Russian collusion thing, the Mueller report cites circumstantial evidence of collusion (conspiracy), but not enough to meet the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
                  The Mueller report DOES contain sufficient evidence of obstruction of justice, and that will be part of the articles of impeachment.

                  Here is another piece of evidence of the "soliciting foreign aid" crime that just came out today:


                  https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/07/polit...ony/index.html
                  Last edited by 99explorer; 11-07-2019, 08:46 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by 99explorer View Post
                    With regard to the Russian collusion thing, the Mueller report cites circumstantial evidence of collusion (conspiracy), but not enough to meet the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
                    The Mueller report DOES contain sufficient evidence of obstruction of justice, and that will be part of the articles of impeachment.

                    Here is another piece of evidence of the "soliciting foreign aid" crime that just came out today:


                    https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/07/polit...ony/index.html
                    IF there was sufficient evidence then Mueller should have brought charges - he is derelict of his duty, charge him. Everybody said Mueller was do great and it turns out he is a washed out has been. Except he knows how to rip people off, that is Law 101 at Harvard Law.
                    Last edited by jhjimbo; 11-07-2019, 10:05 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Jimbo - You can't prosecute a sitting president.
                      But if a Democrat takes office in the next election, Trump is fair game.
                      He could serve time but, thinking ahead, it's more likely he would get something like 5 years probation, and a felony on his record.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        The police solve a lot of crimes with information (tips) provided by a snitch.
                        If the identity of the snitch had to be disclosed, there would be a lot fewer tips.
                        I think that is the idea behind Donald Trump's demanding to know the identity of the whistle blower, as the Ukrainian incident may be just the tip of the iceberg.
                        Last edited by 99explorer; 11-11-2019, 02:48 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Revealing the whistle-blower's identity is unnecessary. If he wishes to remain anonymous, that's fine. Doesn't affect the outcome. Too many others involved who have identified themselves have come forward to give evidence, including someone actually on the phone during the conversation. The whistle-blower's evidence is only third hand and therefore relatively immaterial at this point. Identifying him is pointless.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Demanding to learn the whistle blower's identity was a way of complaining that the inquiry was unfair to Trump.
                            Now Trump is demanding that the whistle blower testify, knowing that he will not. Another claim of unfairness.
                            Thus far in the proceedings, no defense has been offered. Only attacks on the process.
                            Attack, attack, attack!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Now we learn that Trump wanted to fire the Inspector General for following the law in forwarding the whistle blower's complaint along to Congress.

                              https://currently.att.yahoo.com/news...213638013.html

                              Comment

                              Welcome!

                              Collapse

                              Welcome to Field and Streams's Answers section. Here you will find hunting, fishing, and survival tips from the editors of Field and Stream, as well as recommendations from readers like yourself.

                              If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ for information on posting and navigating the forums.

                              And don't forget to check out the latest reviews on guns and outdoor gear on fieldandstream.com.

                              Right Rail 1

                              Collapse

                              Top Active Users

                              Collapse

                              There are no top active users.

                              Right Rail 2

                              Collapse

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              Right Rail 3

                              Collapse

                              Footer Ad

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X