Top Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hello, I'm looking for a new scope for mule deer and elk. I will be hunting in everything from thick timber to open country. I w

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • rudyglove27
    replied
    Agreed with Beekeeper and + 1 for you sir!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • DakotaMan
    replied
    Both are great scopes. I shoot them both. However, I have a 3.5-10x with a 50mm objective on my muley rifle. Not all here agree but I know I have easily 15-20 minutes of additional hunting daily because of the better light collection. I was unable to take the biggest muley I ever saw with a 3-9x 40MM. It was still legal shooting time but I could barely make him out with my naked eye standing back in the trees at 200 yards. When I put my scope up, I saw nothing but shadows and could not take a shot. Now, with the 3.5-10x VXIII 50mm, I see much better in those conditions than I can with my naked eye. Note this will only affect you if you are early AM, late PM or in very dark timber on a very dark and cloudy day. I'm not taking mine off my muley rifle no matter what they say. Sometimes light can make a difference and I want to be prepared for every legal minute of hunting.

    Leave a comment:


  • ernyuma
    replied
    Nikon Buckmaster w/ bdc. By far the best for the money.

    Leave a comment:


  • IanS
    replied
    I had a 3-9 x 40 Bushnell on my last rifle. It was on a Remington 760 .270 win. It would not stay sighted in. This last Christmas I bought a new Tikka T3 270 and hesitantly put a Leupold FX II 4 x 33. I love the set up. I got it sighted in a couple weeks ago and it hasen't moved a bit. I can easily shoot 200 yards (that is the farthest target at the range I go to) and I think I could go a little further maybe 250 or 300. Depending on your eyes and how far you are confident shooting I would highly recommend this scope.

    Leave a comment:


  • teufelhunden
    replied
    Leupold VXII in 3-9 40mm. best all around scope in my opinion.

    Leave a comment:


  • whiskeyjack0311
    replied
    Call sign from Marine Corps days. Thanks for the help.

    Leave a comment:


  • buckhunter
    replied
    Whiskeyjack,

    How did you come up with your name?

    Oh, get a fixed 4x.

    Leave a comment:


  • bonnier-admin_2
    replied
    Leupold VX II's
    After 4 years 86-90 in Alaska owning two and witnessing hundreds of Leupold VX II's put through brutal punishment from recoiling rifles to carrying on ATV’s and handling the arctic environment to include everything you can imagine, the Leupold VX II's is my top pick! The two I have are still going strong. One in mounted on a 30-06 and the other on a 338 Win Mag

    Bottom line

    You pretty much get what you pay for and sometimes you wished you spent the extra buck rather than missing that BUCK!

    Leave a comment:


  • Hunter Savage
    replied
    i have (2) 2-7 compact scopes a burris and Leupold and they are just the ticket for quick close shooting as Shane stated . any of my other rifles that i normaly wouldent carry still hunting or tracking in thick cover have 3-9's on them

    Leave a comment:


  • Del in KS
    replied
    Shane is absolutely right. I hunted all over Alaska with a 350 rem mag and Leupold VXIII 1 3/4-5X scope and never had a problem hitting out to 300 yds. The kill zone on just about any big game is pie plate size or bigger. You don't need lots of magnification in timber. With a high mag scope if you get a close shot you will only see fur. That happened to me in Georgia deer hunting once.

    Leave a comment:


  • shane
    replied
    Always err on the side of the short shots. You can take any reasonable shot up at 7x, but it's harder to make quick, close, snapshots at 3x. At 2x you can almost keep both eyes open. Target acquisition and aiming quickly are much easier at 2x or under.

    Leave a comment:


  • whiskeyjack0311
    replied
    Thanks for the ideas. It will be mounted on a 30-06.

    Leave a comment:


  • matouse3
    replied
    I love my 3x9 Nikon prostaff (probably will get some heat for this) better than my Leupold. Not to mention its cheaper and has the same warranty. I had a 2x7, it just didn't get it done for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Big O
    replied
    I'm with Beeekeeper here. Leupold 3x9 40mm should be everything you need in a scope.
    That is a good responce though Mr. Cooper, +1 for you !

    Leave a comment:


  • Beekeeper
    replied
    Leupold VX II's are a very goodscope at a reasonable price and are available in both power ranges. The 2x7 is a slightly shorter tube with a 33 mm diameter reticle. The 3x9 is slightly longer with a 40 mm reticle. Theoretically the 40 mm should catch more light in dark situations, but most folks wouldn't be able to tell the difference.

    Leave a comment:

Welcome!

Collapse

Welcome to Field and Streams's Answers section. Here you will find hunting, fishing, and survival tips from the editors of Field and Stream, as well as recommendations from readers like yourself.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ for information on posting and navigating the forums.

And don't forget to check out the latest reviews on guns and outdoor gear on fieldandstream.com.

Right Rail 1

Collapse

Top Active Users

Collapse

There are no top active users.

Right Rail 2

Collapse

Latest Topics

Collapse

Right Rail 3

Collapse

Footer Ad

Collapse
Working...
X