Originally posted by dewman
View Post
Top Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Well bought another one I don’t have time to shoot.
Collapse
X
-
-
I'm about an hour +/- north and west of caruthersville. Nice casino hall, clean them out boy. 👍🏻
Here is where they talk about Howas on rimfirecentral. I will caution you about this forum. Lots of bitchin. If you take every dumba** comment as gospel nobody would buy any damn 22. 😉 But there are good tips and techniques as well. I'm dewman708 by the way.Last edited by dewman; 05-11-2022, 07:51 AM.
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Milldawg... I’m thinking about a diamond back tactical with side focus. [/QUOTE]
The Diamondback is a great scope for the price but it is a centerfire rifle scope that is parallax zeroed for 100 yards. This doesn't work well on shorter range .22LR shooting because the point of aim is not actually where it appears to be much of the time(e.g. when you are shooting 25-75 yards) . The parallax control on the side is required to adjust parallax at magnifications beyond 12X. Such high magnification is actually a hindrance to most .22LR shooting because it reduces the field of view too much to get on target quickly at the shorter ranges that the .22LR is commonly used. A magnification larger than 14X is seldom required for .22LR ranges and having to adjust the parallax control each time you change shooting distance is a bit of a pain. I use the 3-7X Crossfire .22LR scope and I"m very happy with it. I might consider a higher magnification scope for competitive .22LR shooting but prefer a peep sight for that due to the short range. If you are shooting gophers, squirrels, etc. the 3-7X lets you shoot them in the head inside of 100 yards.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DakotaMan View Post
The Diamondback is a great scope for the price but it is a centerfire rifle scope that is parallax zeroed for 100 yards. This doesn't work well on shorter range .22LR shooting because the point of aim is not actually where it appears to be much of the time(e.g. when you are shooting 25-75 yards) . The parallax control on the side is required to adjust parallax at magnifications beyond 12X. Such high magnification is actually a hindrance to most .22LR shooting because it reduces the field of view too much to get on target quickly at the shorter ranges that the .22LR is commonly used. A magnification larger than 14X is seldom required for .22LR ranges and having to adjust the parallax control each time you change shooting distance is a bit of a pain. I use the 3-7X Crossfire .22LR scope and I"m very happy with it. I might consider a higher magnification scope for competitive .22LR shooting but prefer a peep sight for that due to the short range. If you are shooting gophers, squirrels, etc. the 3-7X lets you shoot them in the head inside of 100 yards.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Milldawg View PostThe leupold Rimfire 3-9x40 has caught my eye. Since I was informed I was a scope snob the other day at work. Because I don’t buy center point at Walmart. Laughed all the way home.
A "snob" would be looking for a Zeiss! LOL!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Milldawg View PostThe leupold Rimfire 3-9x40 has caught my eye. Since I was informed I was a scope snob the other day at work. Because I don’t buy center point at Walmart. Laughed all the way home.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FirstBubba View Post
There is a difference between being a snob and understanding "you get what you pay for".
A "snob" would be looking for a Zeiss! LOL!
Comment
-
Originally posted by DakotaMan View Post
It pays to be a snob. I would not use a rifle that is not accurate and you need a precision scope to get that accuracy. I suspect the Leupold RImfire will be a good scope but haven't tried it. I know the Crossfire rimfire works. You will be glad you went with the rimfire version for sure. Have fun with it as I expect that new rifle can SHOOT.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Milldawg View PostAnyone have any suggestions for a muzzle break or am I wasting my time I may put a vortex flash hider on it just for giggles.
I think I'd go flash hider.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Milldawg View PostAnyone have any suggestions for a muzzle break or am I wasting my time I may put a vortex flash hider on it just for giggles.
FWIW putting a Leupold rimfire on your 22 doesn't make you a snob, it makes you frugal and deadly. Put a custom Nightforce or a Huskemaw on your model 60 might do it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dewman View PostIt is widely known and accepted (look everywhere reputable online) that muzzle breaks do zero for a 22 rifle, flash hiders the same. (What flash?) I can vouch for the vortex diamondback rimfire. Believe it as good as Leupolds rimfire version with at least as good if not better warranty. And remember, I'm a Leupold fanboy.
FWIW putting a Leupold rimfire on your 22 doesn't make you a snob, it makes you frugal and deadly. Put a custom Nightforce or a Huskemaw on your model 60 might do it.
Comment
-
Aw, that's sweet. Been trying for 33 yrs to give the wife a bigger diamond in her ring but she refuses. She says she wants "her" diamond. The one I stood at an alter and spoke vows to her and God on. Women 🤦🏻♂️
However, that doesn't mean she'll turn down a new car, should I offer.😉
Comment
Welcome!
Collapse
Welcome to Field and Streams's Answers section. Here you will find hunting, fishing, and survival tips from the editors of Field and Stream, as well as recommendations from readers like yourself.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ for information on posting and navigating the forums.
And don't forget to check out the latest reviews on guns and outdoor gear on fieldandstream.com.
Right Rail 1
Collapse
Top Active Users
Collapse
There are no top active users.
Right Rail 2
Collapse
Latest Topics
Collapse
-
Reply to Jan. 6 committee illegally formedby labrador12The only thing that I can testify to under oath is that there was no Insurrection on Jan 6. If the over six months of Democrat sponsered and paid for...
-
Channel: Other
Today, 11:50 AM -
-
by FirstBubbaNumber 1 - the committee was SUPPOSED to be composed of 8 (D)'s and 5 (R)'s.
Pelosi rejected three of the (R) members and filled the spots with...-
Channel: Other
06-11-2022, 08:51 AM -
-
Reply to Jan. 6 committee illegally formedWhen there is no cross examination of a proposed ‘witness’ anything can be claimed as truth ! When rebuttal is not offered, or even intended, there...
-
Channel: Other
Today, 10:35 AM -
-
Reply to Jan. 6 committee illegally formedby 99explorerWhy don't you volunteer to go before the committee and testify under oath concerning all that you know about the Jan.6 insurrection?
-
Channel: Other
Today, 10:33 AM -
-
Reply to Jan. 6 committee illegally formedby labrador12The Jan6 Selected Committee Show trial is a TV show. It's the Beverly Hillbillies goes to Washington DC. The Nancy Pelosi Narrative is what it's revealing....
-
Channel: Other
Today, 10:26 AM -
Right Rail 3
Collapse
Footer Ad
Collapse
Comment